The Chemistry of Leadership: Integrating STEAM and Experiential Learning to Enhance Student Leadership Skills

Authors

  • Djihan Ryn Pratiwi Mulawarman University
  • Noor Hindryawati Mulawarman University
  • Winni Astuti Mulawarman University
  • Eva Marliana Mulawarman University
  • Erwin Mulawarman University
  • Rudi Kartika Mulawarman University
  • Ritbey Ruga Mulawarman University
  • Rita Hairani Mulawarman University
  • Dirgarini J.N Mulawarman University
  • Saibun Sitorus Mulawarman University
  • Daniel Mulawarman University
  • Veliyana Londong Mulawarman University
  • Chairul Saleh Mulawarman University
  • Abdul Aziz Mulawarman University
  • Subur.P. Pasaribu Mulawarman University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/ijsd.v5i2.14

Keywords:

Student Leadership, Experiential Learning, Character Education, STEAM Education, Community Engagement

Abstract

The development of leadership skills among junior high school students is an essential component of 21st-century character education. However, many school-based programs remain conventional and lack contextual learning experiences that integrate academic knowledge with social competencies. This community engagement initiative, conducted by the Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Mulawarman, aimed to enhance students’ leadership, communication, collaboration, and problem-solving skills through The Chemistry of Leadership Camp: Explore, React, Lead!. The program was implemented in two phases. The first phase, conducted at Berambai Waterfall, focused on leadership development through outdoor experiential learning involving 30 student council members. The second phase, conducted at SMPN 42 Samarinda, aimed to strengthen students’ character based on the eight dimensions of the graduate profile through talent showcase and reflective activities. The program applied experiential learning integrated with scientific simulations and STEAM-based collaboration. The results showed a significant improvement in leadership understanding, with mean scores increasing from 62.5 to 88.3, and correct response rates rising from 62.2% to 91.1%. Chemical analogies effectively supported conceptual understanding. Overall, this model offers an innovative and replicable approach to leadership and character education

References

Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2021). Transformational Leadership (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Bybee, R. W. (2019). STEM education trends and future directions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(1), 1–8.

Dugan, J. P., & Komives, S. R. (2019). Developing leadership capacity in college students. Journal of Leadership Education, 18(3), 1–15.

Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Panduan Proyek Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila. Jakarta.

Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. New Jersey: Pearson Education.

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22.

Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of STEM integration and education. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 1–15.

Nichols, M., & Cator, K. (2021). Challenge-based learning in education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(4), 456–470.

Northouse, P. G. (2022). Leadership: Theory and Practice (9th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Perignat, E., & Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2019). STEAM in practice and research. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 31–43.

Santrock, J. W. (2018). Adolescence (16th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2020). Generation Z goes to college. Jossey-Bass.

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2021). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

World Economic Forum. (2020). The future of jobs report 2020. World Economic Forum.

Yakman, G., & Lee, H. (2012). STEAM education. Journal of Technology Education, 24(1), 1–18.

Published

2026-04-29

Issue

Section

Articles