Hands-on Contextual Chemistry Experiments Using Local Materials To Enhance Students’ Scientific Understanding at Smp Negeri 42 Samarinda
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/ijsd.v5i4.37Keywords:
Chemistry Outreach, Contextual Learning, Hands-On Learning, Local Materials; Natural Indicators, Science EducationAbstract
Chemistry concepts at the junior high school level can be difficult to understand when learning is dominated by theoretical explanations and students have limited opportunities to observe scientific phenomena directly. This community engagement activity aimed to introduce contextual chemistry through simple, low-cost experiments using materials that are readily available in the students’ surroundings. The activity was conducted at SMP Negeri 42 Samarinda on 27 July 2026 and involved 60 students from Grades 7, 8, and 9. Grade 7 students investigated simple water filtration using activated carbon, silica sand, zeolite, and gravel; Grade 8 students investigated carbon dioxide formation from vinegar and baking soda; and Grade 9 students investigated acid–base properties using natural indicators prepared from butterfly pea flowers, hibiscus flowers, and turmeric. The program consisted of an opening session, a 10-item pre-test, conceptual presentation, hands-on practical activities, a 10-item post-test, and student appreciation. The pre-test mean score was 45.5, with 60% of students scoring 40, 25% scoring 50, and 15% scoring 60. After the practical activities, the mean score increased to 89.5; 95% of students achieved a score of 90 and 5% achieved 80. The mean score therefore increased by 44 points, equivalent to a 96.70% relative increase. The findings indicate that contextual, hands-on chemistry activities using accessible local materials can improve students’ demonstrated conceptual understanding and stimulate interest in science learning
References
Anderson, A., Kollmann, E. K., Beyer, M., Weitzman, O., Bequette, M., Haupt, G., & Velázquez, H. (2021). Design strategies for hands-on activities to increase interest, relevance, and self-efficacy in chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(6), 1841–1851. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00193
Hanifa, S. R., Ardiansyah, A., Afrianis, N., & Okmarisa, H. (2024). Development of acid-base titration practicum guide using natural indicators of butterfly pea flowers. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 12(1), 68–74. https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v12i1.10813
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning: What it is and why it's here to stay. Corwin Press.
Kelley, E. W. (2021). Sample plan for easy, inexpensive, safe, and relevant hands-on, at-home wet organic chemistry laboratory activities. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(5), 1622–1635. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01172
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
Naimi, W., Vinnacombe-Willson, G. A., Saldana, S., Ronduen, L., Domjan, H., & Chiang, N. (2024). Teaching acid–base fundamentals and introducing pH using butterfly pea flower tea. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(3), 1373–1378. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c01058
Susiloningsih, E., Sumantri, M. S., & Marini, A. (2023). Experiential learning model in science learning: Systematic literature review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(9), 550–557. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.4452
Fitri, C. B. S., & Fikroh, R. A. (2022). The potential of Clitoria ternatea L. extracts as an alternative indicator in acid-base titration. Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA, 6(4).
Strata, T. T. S., Henriksen, E. K., & Jegstad, K. M. (2023). Inquiry-based science education in science teacher education: A systematic review. Studies in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2023.2207148





















