Digitalization of Electoral Governance In Indonesia: Pancasila, Online Voting, Verified Voter Registration, and Electoral Integrity for the 2029 National Election and Subsequent Local Elections
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/ijsd.v5i5.60Keywords:
Pancasila; Digital Election, Online Voting, Voter Registry, Electoral Integrity, Election Law, Local Elections, Cybersecurity, Democratic GovernanceAbstract
This article examines the constitutional and governance challenges of digitalizing electoral administration in Indonesia, with attention to the 2029 national election and the subsequent local-election cycle. It integrates a Pancasila-based reconstruction of democratic governance with a proposed Verified Digital Electoral Integrity Model (V-DEIM), consisting of a continuously verified voter registry, electronic authentication, privacy-preserving online voting, immutable audit trails, multi-institutional complaint handling, and independent post-election audits. The study uses normative legal analysis, comparative governance analysis, and secondary-data analysis of official electoral sources. It does not assume that allegations of manipulation in the 2024 election were proven; documented administrative problems and enforcement data are treated as risk indicators. Official KPU data recorded 204,807,222 voters in the 2024 permanent voter register, while Bawaslu reported 531 violations, 386 matters classified as non-violations, and 279 matters still under process in its cited national handling snapshot. The analysis finds that Constitutional Court jurisprudence permits electronic voting only when cumulative conditions are met, that the 2024 data justify stronger preventive controls without supporting a generalized conclusion of manipulation, and that Pancasila values can be translated into verifiable technical safeguards. Online voting should therefore be introduced through staged, hybrid pilots after independent certification of secrecy, cybersecurity, auditability, accessibility, and institutional readiness. The model is conceptual and requires technical and empirical testing
References
Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum. (2025). Kompilasi data penanganan pelanggaran Pemilu 2024. Satu Data Bawaslu.
Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum. Bawaslu sampaikan evaluasi pengawasan Pemilu 2024 ke DPR.
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2010). Decision No. 147/PUU-VII/2009, 30 March 2010.
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2024). Decision No. 137/PUU-XXII/2024.
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2024). Decision No. 135/PUU-XXII/2024.
Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia of 1945.
Council of Europe. (2017). Recommendation CM/Rec(2017)5 on standards for e-voting.
International IDEA. Resources on electoral integrity, digital technology, and election management.
Komisi Pemilihan Umum. (2023). Decision No. 857 of 2023 concerning the national permanent voter register for the 2024 election.
Komisi Pemilihan Umum. (2024). Official 2024 voter-register fact sheet.
Nasution, M. Rekonstruksi sistem pemerintahan berlandaskan Pancasila dalam mewujudkan stabilitas nasional, kepastian hukum, dan kesejahteraan rakyat dalam bingkai UUD 1945. Unpublished manuscript.
OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights. Election observation and assessment methodologies.
Republic of Indonesia. (2016). Law No. 10 of 2016 concerning the election of governors, regents, and mayors, as amended.
Republic of Indonesia. (2017). Law No. 7 of 2017 concerning general elections, as amended.
Republic of Indonesia. (2022). Law No. 27 of 2022 concerning personal data protection.





















