Reconstructing Digital Fiduciary Execution: Debtor Protection, Certainty of Principal Payment, and Reform of Police Complaint Handling
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/ijsd.v5i5.61Keywords:
Digital Hajj, Digital Umrah, Digital Identity, Dynamic QR Code, Holographic Authentication, Hajj Proxy, Pilgrim Protection, Cross-Border GovernanceAbstract
Vehicle financing secured by fiduciary guarantees requires a balance between certainty of creditor recovery and protection of debtor rights. This article examines the legal problems of fiduciary execution, particularly payment arrears of about three months, which in practice are often read immediately as serious default, unilateral repossession, or suspected crime. Using normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, it draws on the Fiduciary Guarantee Law, the Civil Code, criminal procedure law, Financial Services Authority regulations, and Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019. The findings are that (1) default may not be determined unilaterally by the creditor, so a three-month arrear is a risk signal rather than an automatic trigger for execution; (2) principal, interest or margin, penalties, and fees must be traceable to the contract and payment records; (3) financing disputes must be distinguished from allegations of crime; and (4) CCTV, witnesses, and electronic documents have value only when verifiable and tested against other evidence. The article proposes the Digital Fiduciary Enforcement and Consumer Protection Model (DFECP), a process-and-evidence framework linking contracts, payment histories, arrears verification, electronic evidence, police complaints, and an enforcement gate in one audit trail. DFECP creates no new enforcement authority. The study is normative; empirical analysis of contract clauses and case files has not yet been done and is set out as a further research agenda.
References
Diputri, Ni Putu Natasya Angela, & Dewi, Gusti Ayu Arya Prima. (2025). Perlindungan hukum bagi debitur dalam eksekusi jaminan fidusia berdasarkan Putusan MK No.18/PUU-XVII/2019. Kertha Wicara.
Hastijoko, Radite, & Deni, Fitra. (2023). Analisis yuridis perlindungan hukum bagi debitur yang melakukan wanprestasi terhadap objek jaminan fidusia. Jurnal Audi Alteram Partem.
Indonesia. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Indonesia. (1981). Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana.
Indonesia. (1999). Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia.
Indonesia. (1999). Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.
Indonesia. (2002). Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia.
Indonesia. (2023). Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Indonesia. (2024). Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.
Indonesia. (2025). Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2025 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Nomor 2/PUU-XIX/2021.
Nurdin, Abdul Rahman, Makkawaru, Zulkifli, & Kamsilaniah. (2026). Implementasi eksekusi jaminan fidusia oleh debt collector dan perlindungan hak debitur di Sulawesi Barat. Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law.
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2018). Peraturan OJK Nomor 35/POJK.05/2018 tentang Penyelenggaraan Usaha Perusahaan Pembiayaan.
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2023). Peraturan OJK Nomor 22 Tahun 2023 tentang Pelindungan Konsumen dan Masyarakat di Sektor Jasa Keuangan.
Peraturan Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2021 tentang Penanganan Tindak Pidana Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif.
Priyanto, Ahmad Fadli, & Ramli, Muh. (2026). Perlindungan hukum bagi kreditur dan debitur dalam perjanjian jaminan fidusia. Iqtishaduna.
Putri, Arumdani Sekarkinanti, & Apriani, Rani. (2022). Perlindungan hukum terhadap debitur yang mengalami pengeksekusian paksa obyek jaminan fidusia oleh debt collector. Jurnal Justitia.
Soekanto, Soerjono, & Mamudji, Sri. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
